My System

This is a description of the evolution of my system. The oldest iterations are at the bottom, and the newest at the top. 

Much of the text is written at the time the changes were made. It reflects my thoughts and impressions at the time, and may not necessarily be what I think is a good idea now. 

2025

Early last year I moved into my own house, and the system is set up in the living room. The top parts of the bass horns are again painted in the same color as the walls, making them less conspicuous. 

System2025Lsp

The amplifier for the midrange and tweeters is still the 4-channel Neurochrome amp I built a few years back, but I have added a switch box so I can easily test other amplifiers on the midrange horn. 

The rest of the system is closer to the listening position. A new addition is a USB to HiQNet box that functions as a 2x8 channel sound card and connects my computer digitally to the BSS crossover. This also means I can record signals digitally from the crossover, for instance for digitizing LPs or tapes. I also use this with one of the microphone inputs for system measurements. 

System2025Src

2023

I moved to Norway, with horns and all. Got a new job in electronics somewhere along the Oslo fjord, so audio will just be a hobby again. Which will be good. 

As soon as my stuff arrived, I got my system set up in the living room. The room is almost square, so there were some issues with modes, but it seems to have turned out acceptable. 

System 2023

Another issue was the reflection from the back wall, which was much closer than in my house in the UK. So I put together a quick and dirty absorber from strips of old ceiling tiles placed on end (to maximise the absorbtion by avoiding the semireflective white front layer) and some foam that originally came from the NTNU hemi-anechoic chamber that was rebuilt when I was there. 

Absorber1

This ugly mess was then covered with some white cloth (yes, it's not that pretty either, but it doesn't look as bad in more subdued lighting). Having this absorber right behind the listening position cleans up the sound stage significantly. I have demonstrated the effect to visitors on a few occations by placing a hard board in front of the absorber, and the effect is very obvious. 

Absorber2

The room is a compromise, though, and I'm planning to buy my own place soon. 

2022

The bass horns turned out quite well, and I have had no reason to do much in that department since. The main change in the system is that I've replaced the tube amps with Neurochrome Modululs-86 modules. Four channels are built into the same enclosure, and drive the midrange and tweeters. As I plan to build more amplifiers, include solid state ones, I decided to get the Modulus-86 as a reference, since it has very low noise and distortion. And they sounded so good that I've kept them in the system. 

The noise floor of the Modulus-86 is so low that I can't hear it when standing right in front of the horns. Which is, I must say, very nice! The low noise and distortion also makes the amps sound very transparent, revealing more details in the recordings. It's not that the tube amps sounded distorted in any way, they also sounded very clean. But I guess the higher noise floor obscured some details that are now revealed. 

I have also turned the BSS Blu100 into a full preamp, with remote control, Nixi volume control readout and input selector. 

But perhaps the major event in 2022 was that I decided to leave Celestion and move back to Norway. All my stuff, including the bass horns, was packed down and shipped in December. 

2021

As mentioned, in 2018 and 2019 I spent much of my time finishing the Horn Book, so I didn't have much time to work on my system. During 2020 I did various experiments building 15" woofers for the baffles, and also tried various tweeter solutions. More on this later. 

But early 2021 I decided to go ahead and build a bass horn. I haven't had a bass horn since i moved from Øyfjell in 2010, so I was really looking forward to some proper horn bass again. 

The design and construction is described in the article on the Big BenD Bass Horn, so I won't go into detail here. The setup is shown below. 

BigBendSetup2021

The bass horns behave a bit differently from the open baffles, since they are monopoles. Because of this, the first test of the horns in the room was disappointing, since the horns were fighting the room modes. The room is about twice as long as it is wide, causing two modes quite close to each other at ~50Hz, and only a single mode below that at 25Hz. In between there is a deep dip. I hope that a well placed Helmholtz resonator can help.

The tweeters are modified Pioneer PT-406, which have received neodymium magnets from Celestion CDX07-1075. This doubled the gap flux and increased sensitivity markedly over the quite sad original state. 

But this isn't the only change. This summer I aquired a BSS Blu100 DSP through a friend in Norway. The BSS has significantly better capacity than the Behringer DCX, and, it turns out, also sounds a lot better out of the box than my modified DCX. 

 The downside with the BSS is that it doesn't have a digital input, and I have several digital sources. I therefore bought a second hand Musical Fidelity M1 DAC. It has the required number of inputs and balanced outputs, and one was available to pickup within driving distance. 

BssBlu100

The BSS also has a few other issues that had to be addressed. The input and output connectors are screw terminals, it has two small, noisy fans, the output level is high and that makes it noisy when driving horns, and I need an input selector and volume control. 

The connector issue was solved by placing it in a rack cabinet, where I fitted XLR and RCA connectors to the rear panel. The BSS has 12 analog inputs (2x6 stereo channels), and 8 (2x4) analog outputs, all fully balanced. The input channels have up to 48dB gain and phantom power, so I can actually easily connect a microphone to one of them and use my system as a small PA. Which will probably never happen, but the gain can be useful, as described below. 

With 2x6 inputs I basically have a full preamp. The BSS has a set of control inputs at the rear, where switches or control voltages can be used to control certain parameters. I set up one input to control the input selector, another to control the output volume, and a third to select crossover type. Now the volume control isn't ideal, as it limits the resolution of the DACs, but I plan to add a microcontroller controlled relay attenuator to it later, as I did with the DCX. 

The noise issue was solved by attenuating the LF channel using a 20dB pad at the output, and by removing one amplifier stage in the midrange and HF amplifiers, effectively reducing the gain of these by about 20dB (I had previously added an amplifier stage to the SE809 HF amp, but it proved a bit noisy anyway).

With the high available gain, I looked into making a digial RIAA implementation. The amplifiers seem to be quite low noise, even when driven by a Denon DL103. But the RIAA correction proved to be difficult to achieve using the available equalizer settings. The shelving filters implemented in the BSS just don't match the shelving required for RIAA correction. I was considering and outboard solution when I found the files for a RIAA FIR filter at Linear Audio. This worked very well, and the whole setup now works without any issues and sounds at least as good as my RTP RIAA. 

The final modification was to implement delay-derived subtractive crossovers (DDSC) in the BSS. I couldn't do this with the DCX, and it's also not available in most other DSPs unless it's a type that can be freely configured. (The only one I have found which provides it out of the box is the Linea Research ASC48. They call it a Linear Impulse Response (LIR), but the resulting highpass slope looks very similar to what a DDSC would produce.) 

The DDSC filter is based the paper A Family of Linear-Phase Crossover Networks of High Slope Derived by Time Delay by Stanley P. Lipshitz and John Vanderkooy from 1983. I came across this paper when working on the Horn Book, and had wanted to try it since. It basically creates the highpass filter by subtracting the lowpass filter output from a delayed version of the input signal. The delay compensates for the group delay through the lowpass filter, giving up to third order highpass slopes (as opposed to the first order slopes with a peak you get without the delay), and the sum of the highpass and lowpass sections is of course a perfect representation of the input signal. 

I set up the BSS so that I could switch between the standard 4th order Linkwitz-Riley (LKR) filter and the DDSC using one of the control inputs, enabling me to easily compare the two options. I use this configuration for crossing over between the LF and MF channels. The DDSC sums slightly different to the LKR, but I have tried to match their responses as close as possible. Does it make a difference? Yes. There is a subtle but audible difference in the clarity of voices, for instance, which makes the DDSC a small but worthwile improvement over the standard LKR. 

2018

I write about this update to the system nearly two years after the fact. There are two reasons for that. First, that it involves the Celestion Axi2050, which was not available except as OEM at the time of writing, and Celestion was already getting requests after the driver had been shown at ETF17. I wrote about the drivers here. So they asked me to not cause any more "trouble". Second, the writing of the Horn Book took a lot of my time in 2018 and 2019, so updating my website took the back seat. Now the Axi driver is available from Lean Business, so I feel it's safe to write about it.

So, back to the system upgrade. At the time (2018) Celestion was still not having a full volume production of the Axi2050, and the units that were produced were going to important OEM customers. But we (yes, I work at Celestion - but don't ask me to get cheap drivers for you!) had a couple of prototypes on the shelf.

 Axi2050Protos Axi2050Proto2

The drivers are quite big, and with the 2" exit they didn't fit the midrange horn directly. For ETF I had had a new throat section made, so these were put into service in my own system as well. 

AxiOnMidHorn

So if you ever wondered what the mysterious box at the ETF-17 horns was, it was just a frame for holding the 3D-printed throat section for the Axi205s. 

AxiOnMidHorn2

The Axi2050 prototypes have been in my system for about two years now (2020), and I'm still very happy with them. The wide band seamless midrange is addictive (and maybe part of the magic in Western Electric systems). The drivers are also low distortion and very transparent, without the high-frequency hashness of typical large-format compression drivers. That was actually the first thing I noticed about the Axi2050 when it was demonstrated to me at my first visit to Celestion.

I have used them both with and without extra tweeters, and I cross them at 300Hz. They are a bit rough in the top octave (not harsh, just not as smooth), and they don't go all the way to 20kHz, so the system sounds a bit smoother with an extra tweeter. But it doesn't break it to not have the tweeter. I have usually crossed over at 8-10kHz somewhere when using tweeters (this is also where the midrange horns start to lose horizontal directivity control). Unfortunately my SE 809 amps don't have quite enough gain to really keep up with the rest of the system, so before I do more tweeter experimenation, I need to modify the amps. 

Summer 2017 (2)

Moving again... The first place I lived in England was not that great, and the living room was a bit small for a horn system. So this summer I found a better place, with some more space. 

The horns are set up again, and not showing in the picture are the tweeters I have been trying. First a pair of Pioneer PT103, which sound nice but are very directive. Then PT410, which have wider directivity. The tweeters are driven by the SE 809 amps, the PP 300B amps drive the midrange horns, which still run Altec 288Bs. 

SetupAug2017

Summer 2017 

This summer I decided to get my horns back up. I bought some materials and built racks for the horns that mounted on the back of the baffles for the LC1Bs. 

 Horn rack  Horn in rack

In addition, I switched to Altec 515-8Gs in the baffles. They have more bass and more efficiency. And although it says "Low Frequency Horn Loudspeaker" on the back of the magnet, they work pretty well in the baffles too. 

System4spr3

2016

In November I moved to England, to start in a new job. My first house was not very big, so I didn't set up the horn system at once. Instead I put up a pair of open baffles with RCA LC1B in them. 

System LC1B England

 

First things first. As you can see from the picture, I'm in the process of packing out my things, but the system is already set up. The baffles were made by Thomas Dunker for ETF 2016. I took them to England afterwards.

The LC1 is a nice driver. It's a full range unit, but it is two-way, with a small tweeter cone in the center. It has quite wide dispersion too, and sounds pretty good.

2013-2016

The time I lived in my apartment in Trondheim the system did not change much. I experimented with different tweeters and different placements of them, and I finished building the 300B PP amps. They were built into Tektronix 501 oscilloscope cabinets, as shown in my post about ETF 2015.

SystemTrondheim2015

 

Authum 2016 my time as a PhD student was over. I packed down the system and most of my other things at the end of August, and then lived without my horns again for a while. I also sold the Altec bins. After the PhD defense in October, I moved to England.

2013

In August this year I moved into a new apartment. And finally I had enough space to set up my system properly. The living room is not huge, about 4.5 by 3.7 meters, but that's enough if you really want a horn system up running...

When I moved, I also brought the amp racks, and installed everything: the transistor amp runs the 816A bins, and the 809 amps run the AH425 horns. After playing on it this way for a few weeks, I hoked up a pair of PP 300B monoblock prototypes on the horns. You can see them on the middle shelves in the outer racks. The bottom shelves hold the power supplies. The amps are heavily inspired by Lynn Olson's Karna amps, but the output stage is closer to the one used in Western Electric 86A, and the input and driver tubes are European ones.  

 

SystemNewApartmentAug t

When I moved, I also brought the big 200Hz midrange horns. After getting around to building stands for them, where they are suspended in heavy rubber bands, I put them into the system. The 300B amps drive the midrange horns, and the 809 amps drive the tweeters, which are modified PAudio WN-D34 tweeters. They have been modified to a 0.5" exit, and play through a pair of University 4401 Reversed Flare horns. 

The tweeters, which I also used with the AH425s for a short time, provide much more treble energy into the room that the AH425s managed. Both because the AHs beams quite a bit in the top end, and also because the Altec 299-8A drivers are slightly rolled off in the top end. 

Having the big horns back in the system was very satisfying. The directivity of the system is more constant than with the AHs, which means that the sweet spot is much larger, and I also like to let a single horn play more of the voice range.

SystemNewApartmentSept t

2012

For some time now, I have used my AH425 horns with Altec 299-8A drivers with my 816A bins (which now have Altec 515-8G drivers). I use my modified Behringer DCX2496 as crossover and preamp, with the big transistor amp driving the bass bins, and the SE 807 amps driving the midrange horns.

I have also acquired a Sony TTS3000 turntable, which is now fitted with a Denon DL103 MC pickup and runs through the RTP RIAA. 

This setup works pretty well, but the space is really too limited for setting it up properly. But at least it keeps the "horn withdrawal" at bay... And it shows, for those doubting it, that a horn system can be set up in a 4 x 2.5 m room.

SystemNov2012 1_t

SystemNov2012 2_t

2011

Fall 2010 I moved to Trondheim to study. First I used a pair of Jordan JX92S in vented boxes, but that was not very satisfying for a horn enthusiast. I obtained a pair of Altec 816A bins with 511B horns, which is what I use now. That works...

hybelanlegg t 

2010

For several years now, I have been planning, simulating, and building new midrange horns, designed to cover the lower midrange using compression drivers. The horn is designed for modified Altec 288B drivers, with a cutoff frequency of approximately 200Hz.

The performance of these horns is the best I have heard so far. Improved horizontal directivity control gives a much wider sweet spot than the Le Cléac'h horns. They merge better with the bass horns at the crossover frequency (about 300Hz), it is almost seamless. Having most of the voice range in a single channel (300-5000Hz) results in a very good and intimate reproduction of voices.

System2010b t

The tweeters are Fostex FT17 units, they are a bit better matched than my pair of 2402s, but are not as efficient. Also, they are not as good as the manufacturer's data indicate...

This was the last change I made to my system. A month after completing and installing the horns, I had to pack it all down, as I was moving. I'm now living in a quite small apartment where there is no place for a large horn system.

System2010 t 

2009

During the fall of 2008, I collaborated with Lynn Olson and Martin Seddon (of Azurahorn.) in the design of the AH425 Le Cléac'h horns. My part in that project was mainly simulating the horn using Boundary Element Method (BEM) SW, and to be a discussion partner. This horn was specifically designed to match the Altec 288 series of compression drivers.

lecleachah425 t

I decided to buy a pair of these horns, both because I was curious about how they sounded, and because I had just acquired a pair of 288C drivers. (There is a slight difference between 288B and 288C. The C version has better HF response, and is usually the better choice. The B version has a larger distance between the diaphragm and the phasing plug, which gives it better low frequency headroom, but poorer HF response. Taking this into account, it is odd that the B version is more expensive, since the HF response is usually what is most important in the systems where this driver is used).

The 288C on the AH425 sounded really good. But even the 288C doesn't go all the way up, so I crossed in the 2402 tweeters at about 7kHz. The performance was superior to anything I've had to that point. Better imaging, more details.

In addition to new horns, I also built new racks for the power amplifiers. They are constructed along the same lines as the preamp/source rack, using threaded rods and wood boards. Ikea had resized their butcher blocks, so they are now too small for rack shelf use.

System2009 t

And finally, I also finished the new balanced RIAA stage that I have been working on for a long time. It's basically an implementation of Allen Wright's RTP5 preamp, without source selector or volume control. It sounds good, and is very quiet. The stage lineup is first a hybrid differential cascode stage using 2SK170 and E88CC. Then an ordinary differential E88CC stage, followed by an E88CC/IRF840 SLCF. The output goes into the modified Behringer DCX2496 preamp/crossover.

Riaa 2009_t

The RIAA is built on the chassis of a Tektronix plug-in module, which plugs into a power supply that is used with the modules when they are operated as stand-alone units. (I can't remember the type no.). Both the module and the PSU have of course been completely rebuilt to fit the requirements of the RIAA. With this plug-in system, I can try different RIAA solutions without having to build a new PSU for each.

Riaa 2009_2_t 

2008

At a junk yard, I found a pair of Philips EL6400 amps. Since 20W of class B power is not what works best with high efficiency horns, I decided to keep the output and power transformers, and build a pair of new amps on the old chassis. The amps look pretty cool, and have plenty of space when the microphone inputs are not required. The circuit is a differential stage with E88CC driving a pair of triode connected EL84s, for about 3-4W output. I use this amp for my tweeters.

pp el84amp_t

The tweeters are now JBL 2402. This was a great step up from University Mid-T drivers, which are actually very poor. The horns are very interesting designs, but they need good drivers. The original University drivers have too low a mass corner frequency, and are not well suited for tweeter use.

2402 t

The tweeters and midrange were aligned for best possible impulse response. This required not reversing one of the drivers, but rather separating the crossover frequencies to avoid the dip at the crossover frequency. Reversing the tweeter surely made the frequency response look better, but the impulse response got worse.

Setup2009a t

This summer I took a pair of Ikea wooden blocks and made a new plinth for my L75. Much better than the original flimsy particle board plinth.

modl75 t

This year I have also upgraded my DCX2496 with Frank Oettle's input module, an upgrade which greatly enhanced the sound, and removed some odd behaviour at the digital input.

2007

This amp is designed in a way a class A2 amp should not be designed: the output tube does not draw grid current through the whole cycle. That is not practical with 809, which is a 25W transmitting triode with a µ of 50. But with a low impedance driver, in this case triode-connected D3a DC-coupled to the 809 grid, it works well. The input stage was originally a 6SN7 differential stage, but it had too little gain, and was changed to 6SL7. Operating point and anode load resistors were changed too. This amp sounds very good, I think it is my best amp so far.

SE809 t

2006

During the winter 2005/2006 and spring 2006, not much happened, except that I removed the JLH amp from midbass duty and installed the big transistor amp there instead. The subwoofer is now driven by a DIY 60Wpc transistor amp with build-in cross-over and parametric equalizer. And I also built a small single-ended 807 amp with Hammond iron. The 807 is operated in tetrode mode with feedback from plate to grid, and is driven by an E83F.

In October 2006 there was a big change in the speaker setup. During the summer a friend and I had built 4 big basshorns for sound reinforcement, two for sale and two for personal use. The horns are 103cm W x 64cm H x 81cm D, or about half a cubic metre. Since we needed a place to store the horns when not in use (which will not be very often), I took them home.

The drivers are JBL 2205B (alnico). The horn itself is a 1.8m long folded hypex horn with a 43Hz cutoff, designed for floor/wall placement. It has good dynamics in the midbass, delivering tight, powerful bass, and meets the subwoofer much better than my previous horns. It may seem strange, but I have more floor space now than with the old midbass horns. The new ones are only 81 cm deep compared to 130 cm for the old ones.

basshorn venstre_t

In addition the old tractrix prototype horns have been replaced by a kind of constant directivity horn, using parts from my old Trinity horns. They are NOT conical horns. The first part of the horn is exponential, two coupled segments of different flare, terminated in a conical mouth part that controls the directivity. The throat impedance is very smooth down to about 500Hz, as is the power factor.

Tweeters are University 4408 with MID-T drivers.

Basshorn Hoyre_t

2005

As all the horns in the system have different lengths, and as I plan new horns that require different crossover frequencies, an adjustable active crossover with time delay would be nice. The Behringer DCX2496 is a cheap solution, with lots of flexibility. Correcting the delay differences between midbass, midrange and tweeter made the system sound much more coherent and "real". The DCX can barely be seen at the bottom of the picture, under the old preamp, now in use as phono stage. The new rack (right) can also be seen. It is made from butcher blocks and all-threads, and is not as wobbly as the former rack (still in use, to the left).

Pr July 2005, the 6AS7G amp drives the midrange, the JLH amp drives the midbass, and the 3.5W SE UL amp drives the tweeters.

Setup2005b t

I must mention that I was very sceptical about introducing a DSP device into the signal path, but the sonic degradations (I lost a little dynamics and definition) are small, and just time correcting the horns was a great step forward. But anyway, there is a lot of hacking to do in the analog stages, and by running the input at a constant high level and having the gain controls at the output, I expect great improvements.

 

2004

Summer: Horns again!

June 2004 I visited Thomas Dunker, and listened to his horn system. Getting back home, I realised that even if my system sounded good tonally, it lacked dynamics. As I had just bought a pair of JBL 2470 compression drivers on eBay, I hooked them up on a pair of unfinished Edgar-style tractrix horns. And the dynamics came back! I switched back to the 3.5W SE UL amp, and the 150Wpc transistor amp is now back in subwoofer service.

 Setup2005a t

The 2470s do lack the ultimate top end, even with titanium diaphragms, so I had to add tweeters. First I added the Seas 6x9" fullrange drivers I used long ago. They are quite a bit less sensitive than the horns, so they needed an extra amp. The result was a 6Wpc PP amp using 6AS7G in the output stage.

 6AS7amp1 t

February 2005 I bought a pair of University 4401-horns with Mid-T drivers. They are much better than the Seas drivers, and are now in use in the system, as shown in the picture above.

March

Much has changed... I still use the subhorn and midbass horns, but from 500Hz and up, I now use a pair of Jordan JX92s, driven by the Slone 150W amp (the 3.5W SE amp is too small). To drive the subhorn I use an old Sammic PA amplifier using only one channel and both subhorn drivers in parallel.

 Setup2004a t

Trying the Jordans was a great step forward. They are extremely detailed, and have the most natural voice reproduction I have heard. They have a bit too much in the top end though, so I use a small line level correction network to level them out.

The preamplifier PSU also got a little upgrade, a shunt regulator similar to Allen Wright's SuperReg, but without the current source. This improved low level details and perceived noise floor.

 he Sony player is also upgraded with new clock, extra bypass capacitors around the VC24 filter, and a new analog stage. Right now I use an analog stage similar to Allen Wright Level 1 upgrade, but the plan is to make a balanced tube based analog stage.

 A somewhat controversial improvment was to use thin solid core silver plated speaker wire. Just good quality wire-wrap wire. It sounds very good, with improved imaging and better "intertransient silence". I tried it first on a friend's system. When we first listened to it, we just looked at each other and laughed; the improvement was obvious and big. And it's cheap too!

2003

This is the setup at fall 2003. The CD-player has changed from a modified Marantz CD63to a Sony DVP-S9000ES (Why does Sony have to use such long complicated names?), the JLH class A amp is used for the midbass, the new SE amp is used for the Trinity speakers. I use the big transistor amp for the subwoofer, which has changed to a horn subwoofer.

setup2003 t

Here is the new SE amp. It has two stages of E80CC driving 4654 in UL mode. 4654 is an old European tube with P-socket. Maximum power at clipping is about 3.5W, which is OK for normal to fairly loud listening on the Trinity horns. Distortion @ 1W with 10dB feedback is 0.12%.

set3 t

The horn subwoofer.

horn0 t

The new, big transistor amp. It is a design from Randy Slone's book "The Audiophile's Project Sourcebook", and works very well. Power is about 150W/ch with very low distortion. Distortion is also very low at low power. I've had it measured with a Rohde & Schwarz Audio Analyzer. IIRC, THD was down at 0.0008% @ 1W from 20-20k. Pretty good! In addition, it sounds very good. Far better than Electrocompaniet AW60, more dynamic than the Zapsolute amp. One reason for the good sound is that it uses 2-pole compensation, which reduces HF distortion significantly. Without it, this amp is nothing special.

bigamp t

2002

The listening room in the barn is cold in the winter. But around Easter (2002) things started to happen again. I moved the system to one of the long walls, and that really improved the LF response. The bass was more even, without the dips that had previously made the sound somewhat thin.

newsetup t

I decided to use the mid compression drivers I had used in the styropor horns together with the Sammi SM-110s in the Unity inspired design, with a passive crossover to make a nice mid/tweet combo. I call this speaker Trinity (3-driver unity summation), and it sounds quite good. I switched from the OTL in the HF range to the old John Linsley-Hood's class A design. This is an amazingly good amplifier, which makes you wonder what audio engineers have been doing since 1969. It's the gray box at the top of the left shelf. Take a look inside. It runs quite hot, so I will paint the heatsinks black.

trinity t

Another new thing is the preamp. I constructed a completely new pre with separate PSU and built-in active crossover. The PSU has tube rectification (PY88) and choke input without electrolytics. The linestage is the same topology as the old one, but with ECC82 instead of 6SN7. For the 500Hz crossover I use PCC88 as cathode followers (they can drive a 10k load with 0.03% thd), and op-amps for the sub XO, 85Hz 4th order L-R.

sources t

The preamp has a 64 step relay controlled attenuator with nixie tube indication, and all inputs are relay controlled. It also has provisions for a remote control, which is not finished yet. Right now I use a cable from switches on my chair to control the volume.

newpre t

2001

After some work, I had a brand new listening room. 4.3 x 6 m, sloping roof: nice. The system was moved in, and the music played again! But there were improvements to come. I added 20cm to the midbass horns to make them go deeper, and later I installed an Eminence Delta 10 woofer in each. This increased efficiency quite a lot. I also made new midrange/tweeter horns. They are constant directivity horns, and look quite like the Lambda Unities (which were the model for my design). At the moment I use only the tweeter, without any midrange drivers. The tweeter is a Sammi SM-110, and it sounds very good to my ears. I have also made a version of the TNT FleXy rack, but using thinner rods and 12mm wood fibre plates. It supports the record player, CD-player, pre-amp and tuner.  It was a real improvement, the record player does not jump anymore, which proves that it decouples effectively from the floor. The midbass horns are also placed on spikes, and the amp rack moved to where the record player stands in the picture.

newroom1 t

2000

Summer

There is always room for improvement. In the summer of 2000 my midbass horns were born. 80Hz exponential, designed for 10" drivers. But I had a pair of 8" drivers I wanted to try, and they worked pretty well. Midrange and treble as before. The subwoofer is painted in the same color as the midbass horns. For the sub I still use the Boyer 100W amp. The midbass runs on the first prototype of the Surtamp, adjusted for about 3.5W, the OTL runs about 0.1W. Efficient, or what?? But how is the sound? The most important thing in a system is not the look, but the sound. Well, I can say this: This must be the most price-effective system around. Compared to performance, it is incredible. Not counting the sub, all the drivers are at least 20 years old. And besides that: It delivers music as easy and unburdened as only horns can do. I love it.

left1 t

right1 t

Spring

Then it happened: The Great Horn Experience! (have a look at my Why Horns page for more on that.) With some advice and inspiration from Timo Christ, I made some nice, blue styropor horns, using drivers I bought from him. The best sound so far, my old Monitors sounded dead and lifeless by comparison. Here are dynamics, life and MUSIC! The speakers at the top are 6x9" tweeters (!) used from about 3.5kHz and up. They only go to 13kHz.

system3 t

January

 

I moved into grandma's house with my system. Later I also built a new preamp. The old subwoofer is placed in the middle, driven actively by the amp next to it. This is a Boyer 100W mono PA amp. Next to my preamp/CD-setup is my turntable. The table where it stands is not very stable, so I have to be careful when I walk around.

system2 t

1999

This is when my DIY hifi adventure started for real. For years I had built electronic stuff, occasionally some speakers and amps, but mostly radios. For some years my system had consisted of a NAD 501, a Marantz amp, and Monitor Audio 201 speakers. In the summer of 1998 I made an unsuccessful attempt to build an OTL amplifier. After a year away from home, I tried again, and succeeded. It was the best amp I had owned to that date. A true inspiration that initiated the line of evolution chronicled on this page. 

This picture shows my system as it was in the winter of 1999. The amp is my dear OTL, a DIY project. The preamp is also DIY, so are the speaker stands too (surprise!) The speakers are Monitor Audio 201, the CD-players are a NAD 501 and a Marantz CD-38. Not shown is my turntable: an ITT L-75, a CC-SUB subwoofer, 4m Audioquest speaker cable and some 4mm^4 cable for the subwoofer.

anlegg t

Latest blog entry

Horn Loudspeaker Simulation

Horn Loudspeaker Simulation

Many readers may be familiar with the free software Hornresp, which, given driver parameters and some geometrical parameters for the horn and cabinet, can simulate a wide variety of horn, direct radiator and bandpass systems. This may be enough for most people, while others (like me) are curious about the math and algorithms behind it

Simulating horns and horn loudspeakers has interested me for a long time. I found Hornresp back at the time when David McBean first made it available (around 2000 I think). At first you could only get the full functionality by paying a small fee, otherwise the throat area of the first segment was fixed. He later told me that he actually ended up giving the full version for free to those who asked, and if I had known that I'd probably started using it in earnest earlier. But my first midbass horns were designed using Hornresp (with the original limitation), as was my later horn subwoofer and other horns. But around 2005-2006 I got interested in horn theory and other methods of evaluating horn performance, like power factor (the cosine of the phase angle between resistance and reactance of the throat impedance). First I made a program that would read the data exported from Hornresp and plot the power factor. Later I started looking into wave fronts in horns, and combination of horn types (like multiple segment horns with Hypex segments), and for that I needed to write my own horn simulation software. 

I first made contact with David McBean in 2004, and we started corresponding regularly, discussing many aspects of horn simulation. This was extremely helpful when I started writing my own horn simulator, and I can't thank David enough for making Hornresp available, and for guiding me through the rough terrain of horn simulation. Although he never showed me more than a couple of snippets of code, through discussion and references I was able to make things work and learn things from the ground up. 

My horn simulator, HornCAD™, evolved into a complex program that could use the Mode Matching Method (MMM), simulate all types of segments, rectangular horn, and curved horns. It could use measured compression driver data, and export dxf files for CAD use. Thanks to the MMM, directivity simulations were quite accurate, and I used it extensively during my time at Celestion. 

But since HornCAD™ was born as a tool to learn horn simulation and to explore various ways to simulate horns, it is full of unfinished functionality and bugs that are hard to track down due to the size of the code base. Therefore it has never been released to the general public. That may change in the future, though... But enough about my background as a horn simulator writer!

Simulation Basics

The point of this article is to give an introduction to horn loudspeaker simulation. While it may seem like black art for most people, it is more similar to electrical circuit simulation. So in this little series, I plan to explain how to implement a simple "Hornresp-ish" code in Octave/Matlab. It will of course not have all the bells and whistles of Hornresp, but will be able to simulate the power response, electrical impedance and diaphragm displacement of a basic horn loudspeaker. 

Horn loudspeaker simulation typically consists of simulating:

  1. The radiation from the horn, especially radiation impedance, but also directivity.
  2. The horn itself: throat impedance as a function of mouth radiation impedance, and the output volume velocity as a function of the input volume velocity.
  3. The acoustical circuit apart from the horn: front and rear chambers, vents etc.
  4. How the loudspeaker driver behaves when connected to the acoustical load made up by the horn, chambers, vents etc and thereby the power delivered to the horn, the electrical input impedance of the system, diaphragm displacement etc. 

We will cover all of this, but also things like simulating multiple segment horns, horns with special profiles like the tractrix, and maybe even look at tapped horns. 

Glossary

The list above contains many words that may be unfamiliar, but if you want to learn horn simulation, you need to know what they mean. So here is a short glossary:

  • Radiation impedance: When something vibrates with a certain velocity, it pushes the air, and the air pushes back with a certain force. The ratio of this force from the air to the velocity of vibration is the mechanical radiation impedance. In this analogy, force is analoguous to voltage and velocity to current, and just like voltage divided by current gives electrical impedance, force divided by velocity gives mechanical impedance. 
  • Volume velocity: velocity times area, cubic meters per second.
  • Acoustical impedance: A similar analogy can be made in acoustics: with pressure analoguous to voltage and volume velocity analoguous to current, the ratio between them is acoustical impedance. It relates to mechanical impedance through the area of the vibrating surface (which may not be solid, but can be an imaginary surface, for instance the horn mouth). Mechanical impedance is acoustical impedance times area squared.
  • Acoustical circuit: an analoguous circuit of acoustical components like ducts, horns and volumes. It can be drawn like an electrical schematic, and we can calculate its performance based on electrical circuit theory. This is a fundamental method for simulating electroacoustic systems.

Simulation: The Nitty Gritty Details

Here are links to the parts in the series (the links will go live as the parts are added):

  1. Part 1: Radiation and T-Matrix
  2. Part 2: Adding a driver
  3. Part 3: Multiple segments and more T-matrices
  4. Part 4: Other horn profiles and curved wave fronts
  5. Part 5: A simple tapped horn model

The Bass Transmission Index

The Bass Transmission Index

Evaluating the accuracy of low frequency reproduction isn't as straightforward as one may think. There is talk about "fast bass", and PRAT (Pace, Rythm And Timing) is sometimes mentioned as a description. In such a discussion someone will invariably point out that a 20Hz sine wave isn't "fast", and that the issue of fast or slow bass is meaningless. It may seem that way using these simple arguments, until you experience accurate, detailed bass reproduction. But how do we quantify it? Obviously not by measuring the rise time of a 20Hz sine wave! 

This is actually a very real problem. For the mix engineer, perhaps the biggest problem is how a loudspeaker with poor temporal response alters the perceived balance between rhythm section instruments like kick drum and bass guitar. Though not exclusively the case, loudspeakers with ported cabinets (bass reflex loading) are more likely to exhibit this type of problematic behaviour, due to the use of resonant elements to increase bass extension. An incorrect mix made on loudspeakers like this may not transfer well to other sound reproduction systems, and can't be corrected later during mastering, since the two instruments occupy the same part of the audio spectrum.

Lara Harris, Keith Holland and Philip Newell have done extensive work on quantifying bass reproduction accuracy, resulting in Lara's PhD work and the Bass Transmission Index (BTI). The BTI is an objective measure of a loudspeaker's ability to accurately reproduce low-frequency musical content. The metric aims to describe how well a loudspeaker reproduces the temporal envelope of a dynamic and harmonically-complex signal, something that cannot easily be evaluated from the usual frequency response (magnitude plots). 

Like the STI (Speech Transmission Index), as used in speech intelligibility measurements, the BTI is based on a metric called the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). MTF-based methods such as these pass an amplitude-modulated signal through the system, varying the rate of the temporal fluctuations across a range of values that are likely to feature in the real-world signals that the system will encounter. The preservation of modulation depth between input and output is used as an indicator of how well the system can reproduce these temporal variations. The figure below illustrates the concept, showing modulation depth for input (mi) and output (mo) signal envelopes.

MTF

The BTI evaluates the MTF in 10 frequency bands from 16-160Hz, with 7 modulation frequencies from 0.8-11.7Hz. The algorithm computes a matrix of modulation index scores between 0 and 1 for each combination of frequency band and modulation frequency. This grid of numbers can be used to calculate an overall average score, and is visualised as a grayscale intensity image where white = 1.00 (perfect reproduction). As a rule of thumb for interpreting these BTI intensity images:

  • Inconsistent shading in the horizontal direction (left-right) indicates variation in the frequency response magnitude (this is variation across frequency bands).
  • Inconsistent shading in the vertical direction (up-down) indicates variation in the faithfulness of envelope transmission (this is variation across modulation frequencies).

The figure below shows an example BTI intensity image and mean score for a bass-reflex studio monitor. Frequency bands (centre frequencies) are on the x-axis, and modulation frequencies on the y-axis.

BTIplot

Recently I have worked with Lara to make her BTI research code production ready, and it has now been officially made available on GitHub. It runs in Matlab and Octave (although not all the advanced options are available in Octave, and some requires certain Matlab tooboxes), and demonstrates a reference implementation. Here are the links:

BTI Toolbox on GitHub

Lara's LinkedIn post about BTI

My LinkedIn post about BTI

 

Big Bend Bass Horn: Driver Update

Big BenD Bass Horn: Driver Update

[Previous: InstallationMain

This update is actually long overdue, and related to a project at Celestion I wasn't able to finish: a cone driver specifically designed for bass horns. It follows the ideas I outlined under My Approach to Bass Horn Design, and is a 12" driver designed for a compression ratio of about 1:2. As I wanted it to be easy for Celestion to put it into production, I used as many standard parts as possible, either directly or something that could be easily machined from standard parts. But I also added a feature that aren't easy to find in modern drivers: an underhung edge-wound voice coil. 

Here are a some of the features of this driver:

  • Underhung 3" edge-wound voice coil
  • Copper sleve on pole piece
  • Focused magnetic gap
  • Low moving mass
  • Vented pole piece and back plate
  • 250W power handling
  • Large ferrite magnet
  • Inverted dustcap to allow for phase plugs if desired

And for those who worry about the high power rating being detrimental to other qualities important for horn speakers, rest assured: this power rating was a result of the voice coil size and venting, not of "beefing up" the driver (which typically makes the moving assembly lighter) to take higher temperatures and forces. 

Here's a side view of the driver, without the front segments. It's built on a Celestion FTR chassis. 

New driver

The magnet system:

bigBendDrivers3

The gap flux is slightly above 1Tesla, which is quite good for a gap this size. It takes a substantial amount of magnet to produce that, especially when you lose gap width to a copper cap. 

Comparisons with old DIY driver

Below are a couple of photos comparing the new driver to a DIY project I used to begin with, referred to as 12" DIY driver in the performance measurements. The DIY driver used the motor system from a pair of Celestion NTR08-2009D 8" woofers I found in the bin. They had the cones cut out, but the motor was salvageable (even the voice coil), and I used them to build a pair of 12" drivers using available parts. I used the lightest 12" by 2" cones I could find, and a fairly soft spider. They turned out to be quite good, with the BL^2/Re being a good match for my bass horns. But the new drivers are more robust, and also give a very good performance and produces very clean bass in the Big BenD horns. 

Comparision with old DIY driver

Comparision with old DIY driver (back)

 Parameter  Old DIY driver  New driver
 Re [Ohms]  4.46  5.8
 Le [mH]  0.065  0.086
 BL [N/A]  12.3  17.0
 Mms [g]  39.2  64.5
 Rms  [Ns/m]  3.4  0.63
 Cms [m/N]  4.36e-4

 1.88e-4

     
 

Now I just hope Celestion will finialize this project and put the drivers into production, as I think this would be a good driver for bass and midbass horn use, especially for domestic use.

[Previous: InstallationMain

Big BenD Bass Horn: Installation

Big BenD Bass Horn: Installation

[Previous: Performance MeasurementsMain; Driver Update

Finally, the last article about the Big BendD bass horn! This part will cover the installation and setup of the horn, with some comments on the subjective performance at the end.

Installation

Although the DIY 12" driver showed the most promise during outdoor testing, I still wanted to try the Altec 515-8G when setting up the horn. It was mounted in the rear chamber, the chamber was filled with wool, and the rear wall covered with pieces of an acoustic celing tile. 

RearChamberAltecWoolBackWallDamping

Then came the process of carrying all the parts into the living room, setting it up, adding gaskets, bolting it all together, installing the drivers, wiring it up and put the rest of the system back together. In the process I had help from my good friend Harry. This is really a two-person job, because carrying the big parts into the house isn't easy to do by oneself. The parts were all designed to fit through a standard door, but they are still a bit difficult to move around. 

Setup01Setup02Setup03

Setup01Setup05Setup03

Setup01Setup08Setup03

Setup01Setup11Setup03

With two people working, the setup was done in a couple of hours. There are a lot of bolts, about 70 per horn, so or ratchet spanners got a real workout. 

The complete setup is shown below. The white middle/throat sections blend in with the walls, making the bass horn less dominating in the room. It does work, some people have not recognised it as part of the bass horns.

Axi2050Proto1

The First Test: Where's the Bass?

Just setting up the horn and putting some music on, without any crossover or EQ, left us wondering: Where's the bass? Isn't this supposed to be a bass horn? There's a lot of lower midrange, but the sound was a bit thin. 

Altec95dBInRoomThe measurements made it obvious what the problem was: the output fell below 70Hz, and apart from a peak at 50Hz, the response was more like a midbass horn than a 30Hz bass horn. What was going on? 

We swapped the Altec for the DIY 12", and that helped significantly; the better impedance match between the horn and driver was definitely an issue in the presence of room modes. Which turned out to be the real problem.

Room Modes

 My living room is about 7m long and 3.5-4m wide. This means that the second mode in the length direction and the first mode in the width direction are both at about 50Hz, which is also clear from the measurement above. Between these two modes, energy transfer in the room is quite limited. A wider room would definitely be an improvement, but you have to work with what you've got. 

In the modal region in a room, the response can vary quite a lot from position to position. Some listening positions have a smoother response, while others place the listener at peaks or nulls of modes. To find the best starting point for EQing the response, I measured the response in the room at a 2.5 by 3m grid, every 0.5m. The results for all positions are shown below. 

RoomRespGrid

It turned out that the response was quite smooth about 3m from the horns mouths, somewhat behind the middle of the room. The responses at this line are shown below. Annoyingly, the response drops quite sharply below 45Hz, due to the lack of modes between 25Hz and 50Hz, but apart from rebuilding the room (which I'm sure the landlord wouldn't like), there's not much to be done. 

RoomResp3m

I have applied some EQ to lift the response a bit, but one should be very careful with EQing dips caused by room modes. And I'm not going to spend the rest of my life in this house, so hopefully my nest home will have a more beneficial distribution of modes int eh listening room!

Listening Tests

So, after all this work, how does it sound? The lack of output below 45Hz is only noticable on music where you know there should be something down there. Apart from that, the response in the listening position is quite smooth, and it has the traits of bass horns that I have been missing for so long: proper impact - even at low volumes -, and responsive, detailed and tight bass. Low frequency details in the recordings are quite easy to hear, and there's no overhang or resonance. It sounds effortless even at very high volumes too. The horn integrates well with the fast and detailed midrange of the Axi2050, making it a good combination. I also tried a delay-derived subtractive crossover, as described in the Horn Book, and it made a worthwile improvement to the coherence and naturalness in the lower midrange.

All in all, I'm very satisfied with the performance. 

[Previous: Performance MeasurementsMainDriver Update

Big BenD Bass Horn: Performance Measurements

Big BenD Bass Horn: Performance Measurements

[Previous: Belts and braces pt. 4Main; Next: Installation

 With one horn finished, I took it outside to do some frequency response measurements. First thing to do is to measure the horn under conditions similar conditions to the simulations. This is a very important part of designing speakers, if you want to use simulation tools in the process. You need to verify that your simulation is correct, and if not, in what way. It is especially important if you are writing your own simulation software. I think people are getting better at it, but there have been many cases on DIYaudio of people complaining about their simulations being wrong, when the actual problem is that they have not simulated what they have actually built. 

Corner

The actual condition of a horn built into an "infinite corner" (3 infinite baffles perpendicular to each other) isn't easy to achieve in practice. The best I could do was to use the walls of my house and garage:

Testing1

And then put some extra sheets of plywood between the buildings to try to close the gap.

Testing2

So, finally the first measurements, with and without baffles. The difference isn't huge, This may be because the garage is still close enough in terms of wavelengths to contribute to the baffle effect. (I'm not sure if the levels are actually correct, trying to do the calibration in ARTA gave some confusing results.)

MeasuredCornerTxt

So how well does this fit with the simulations? Actually pretty good, see below. The Response below 200Hz is almost spot on, the  response at higher frequencies deviates, probably because of the simple model used for simulating the curving, and because I used a different driver than in the measurements. 

What I'm quite happy with is that the curving approach worked as intended: there are no sharp dips and peaks or suckouts in the response, and it doesn't roll off until about 500Hz. This creates a nice overlap with the midrange horn. At the lower end, the response starts to fall off rapidly below 30Hz, which was the intended lower limit. The response is a bit uneven, but we'll see that this changes with a different driver.

OutdoorResp

Wall

The second test condition is in front of a wall. Neither of the two are fully representative of the operation conditions in actual use, but it will show the effect of placing the horn in front of, instead of flush with, a wall.

Testing3

The effect of one missing side wall and the increased distance to the back wall is evident: a loss of level at low frequencies that was predicted by both the simulations and scale model measurements. 

MeasuredWallTxt

Driver Tests

The next measurements were done with REW as I found it easier to do a level calibration there than when using ARTA. Four different drivers were tested:

Altec 515-8G, a 15" driver built in a Celestion FTR-3070 chassis, A 12" guitar speaker, and a 12" high efficiency woofer built using various parts available. The results are shown below. 

There is a clear difference between the drivers; the guitar speaker clearly fails and has a very peaky response (not all musical instrument drivers are suitable for bass horn use, even if Dr. Bruce Edgar had good results with EVM-12). The 15" drivers perform about the same. The best results comes from the 12" driver I built. This isn't actually very surprising, since it has the best impedance match with the horn of all the drivers. 

The dips in the response at 483Hz and 870Hz are from standing waves in the empty rear chamber.

FR105dBWall

Distortion

Following is some distortion meausrements of the drivers tested. I measured at 95, 105 and 115dB SPL at a 2m distance. Only the results for 115dB (114dB for the 12" prototype) are shown.
Altec115dB

15inDIY115dB

Guitar115dB

12inDIY115dB

The 15" drivers are quite similar in response, but the Altec clearly has lower distortion. The guitar driver has very high distortion (not surprisingly, since it has a stiff paper surround and only 1mm overhang on the voice coil), and is best left to what it was designed to do: create distortion for electric guitars. 

The 12" DIY driver has the smoothest response, and while the distortion is slightly higher than the Altec, they are both quite at "sane" listening levels.  

Altec95dB

12inDIY95dB

[Previous: Belts and braces pt. 4Main; Next: Installation